by
David Green
Member since:
October 17, 2006 President Bush Renews Calls for Oil Exploration in ANWR - Green America
May 08, 2008 07:55 PM UTC
(Updated: June 05, 2008 08:07 AM UTC)
views: 0
|
comments: 71
"...let me start first by telling you that America has got to change its habits. We've got to get off oil." President Bush made these remarks on March 5, 2008. He was speaking at the Washington International Renewable Energy Conference. But now the president is singing a different song. During a press conference held on April 29, Mr. Bush renewed calls for oil exploration and drilling in the long protected Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Back in March, the president identified a number of reasons why America should be working to become less dependent from oil by investing in clean, renewable sources of energy. One reason was national security: "The dependency upon oil also puts us at the mercy of terrorists. If there's tight supply and demand, all it requires is one terrorist disruption of oil and that price goes even higher. It's in our interests to end our dependency on oil because it -- that dependency presents a challenge to our national security." The president also raised concerns about the environment and global warming: "And finally, our dependence on fossil fuels like oil presents a challenge to our environment. When we burn fossil fuels we release greenhouse gases. The concentration of greenhouse gases has increased substantially." And the president has done more than just talk about the problem of oil. He has plan to reduce oil consumption in the United States by 20 percent over the next 10 years: "I laid out a goal for the United States to reduce gasoline consumption by 20 percent over the next 10 years -- that's called 20-10 [sic]. By the way, that's in the face of a growing economy - to reduce gasoline usage by 20 percent over 10 years." But President Bush has apparently forgotten about his committment to help America get off oil. Once again, George W. Bush is showing that he is first and foremost an oil man. For decades the oil industry has worked to push legislation through Congress that would allow oil exploration and production to take place inside of protected ANWR. And each time they have failed. That hasn't stopped the president from floating the idea once again. "And we'll look at any idea in terms of energy. Except, I will tell you this: that if Congress is truly interested in solving the problem, they can send the right signal by saying we're going to explore for oil and gas in the U.S. territories, starting with ANWR," the president told reporters at the April 29 press conference. "We can do so in an environmentally friendly way." ANWR presents the president with politically convenient solution to the problem posed by rising oil prices. He would love to blame environmentalists and their supporters in Congress for the current oil crisis. After all, doing so would shift responsibility for away from the White House. The president would rather play the blame game than acknowledge the role that he has played in creating the current oil crisis. Concerns about instability in the Middle East have helped to drive up oil prices over the past few years. The Bush administration's war in Iraq is the root of many of these concerns. By pushing the ANWR issue at this point in his presidency, Mr. Bush is essentially attempting to dodge the bullet on this issue. He knows that ANWR is a contentious issue that once placed on the table is unlikely to be resolved by the end of his administration. By playing the ANWR card, the president can also pacify his allies oil industry. The president claims that opening ANWR will lead to lower gas prices, or "more oil = lower gas prices". Unfortunately, this simplistic economic equation does not adequetely capture the complexities that dictate oil prices. Global demand for oil will continue to grow at an unprecedented rate and stability in the Middle East is not expected any time soon. We can expect gas prices to remain high in the future. Mr. Bush would love to ignore the fact that a long protected and cherished wildlife refuge even exists in Alaska. During the April 29 press conference he did not once utter the name "Artic National Wildlife Refuge", prefering to refer to the place only as "ANWR". It was as if he feared that using the words "refuge" or "wildlife" would somehow taint his efforts to portray the refuge as nothing more than a giant dollar sign. The president sought to reassure the public that oil exploration in ANWR could be done in an environmentally friendly way. But he was careful to avoid any mention of the toll that oil drilling and oil production would take on ANWR's fragile and unique ecosystem. As is the norm with this administration, knowing what the president did not say is every bit as important as knowing what he did say. "We've got to get off oil," the president said once. He should stick to his guns on this one. America is country built on innovation. It is time to accept the fact that the age of oil is coming to a close. Cheap oil helped make this country great. But cheap oil is a thing of the past. It is time for a new revolution in this country, a clean energy revolution. And this is not a revolution that will start in ANWR. Green America is a new weekly column about environmental politics by Gather political correspondent David Anderson. You can read and comment on past and current editions of the column at the group Green America.
Find more about:
global warming,
live from new hampshire,
energy,
renewable,
us politics,
environment,
climate change,
politics,
republicans,
president,
issues,
emissions,
greenhouse gas emissions,
sustainability,
david anderson,
cost of war,
iraq,
war,
activism,
progressive,
anwr,
arctic national wildlife refuge,
oil,
drilling,
exploration,
clean energy,
renewable energy,
bush,
congress,
president bush,
george w bush,
green,
green america
Find Gather groups:
!!! Team Green !!!, Biofuel Update, Gather News Channel, Gather Politics News Channel, Living a sustainable life, Green America
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
|
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Version 18247, "Zach"; Copyright © 2013 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.




Comments: 71
It is clear that his goal is to promote drilling, mining, logging...desecration of the few pristine wilderness areas that remain.
We need to get rid of these jerks and get some responsible people running the country.
Oh, and John McCain does NOT fit my definition of "responsible." He is more of the same. If you liked Bush, you will love McCain.
Mr. Bush realizes, as most of us do, that we've got to wean the country off it slowly. Any precipitous move and the economy dives into a tailspin. Mr. Bush stated his case a long time ago, and he hasn't moved from that position. He can see an addict, and Mr. Bush doesn't like what he sees.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves
I am for "whatever" needs to be done to end that dependence.
Oil is the blood of the world's economy ... without oil and energy for
transportation, globalization is impossible, prices go us, with our
global dependence all the products that we need, and most of
those that we do not cannot even exist.
For any politician to even bring this up like this is another slap
in the face to the people of the world, let alone the people of
the US.
More and more all the problems that we face become connected,
and yet, we do not face these problems together, increasingly we
become a group of people who wait to be told what is the next
insult we will have to endure, what is the next thing we will have
to live without ... no health care, no education, no jobs, no better
wages ... while the top of the society continues to give themselves
all the rewards for doing enerything wrong ... because they have
taken and we have given them all the power ... why?
Any solution to the problems of the US have to include the world,
and better include some kind of sustainable way we can survive
with nature, and survive with each other, instead of just giving
fast sloganlike answers for everything.
When we think of how many people we are going to have to feed
and provide for we need to think about how to create and transport
enough clean water all around the world. How do we do that without
energy. How do we do that and leave water for rivers and streams
and nature?
Solar sounds nice ... how do we get there with the private for profit
economy we have now? Nuclear we know we can do, and it can provide
the huge amounts of energy and its own supply of fuel for the future,
but can we harness it responsibly without making mistakes?
No one in our government has any vision to solve any of these problems
it seems, we only provide the structure for the same group of screwups
to continue to find ways to milk the rest of us while they are comfortable
and do not have to contribute anything but a wave and smile from their
limosines.
Bush realizes that as we wean the country off oil it just means to keep squeezing us for more and more money, removing what is basically political and individual power from Americans while talking big talk with meaningless words.
It is not the economy Bush seeks to protect it is the control of those who own the economy, the very ones who have given us this situation.
They are lying through their teeth to all the DUMB Americans....and yes...WE DO have enough oil on the north slope of Alaska to take us through the next 500 years even with growth here....ALL Americans OWN the largest known oil reserves on the planet!!!
It exists in Alaska....and it is not being tapped...we could all be paying a dollar a gallon if it was! Our government is 100% owned by the very businesses that we all hate...big oil, and big military contractors....and big banks.....Nobody in government gives a rat's ass about any of us or our children who are dying in a false war in Iraq....
We are living in a country that has broke so many laws that I can't even name them all....We let our Supreme Court Elect our president in 2000 when there were massive voting fraud and discrepancies in Florida....The whole country knows that Al Gore actually won the election....
We now live in a country where the MAJORITY single employer is either military, security, or police. Just think about that for a minute folks! And now we have created the "Department of Homeland Security"....like we needed another Federal Department of anything!!! They won't even protect our southern border! No Federal or even local police agency cares one bit about us...the idea is to create such a hysteria, that any one agency can take control off all of us by the declaration of martial law, and they will do so...probably just before the elections in the fall....
Think I'm a crack pot? Then why are there hundreds upon hundreds of "Homeland Security SUV's and boats....all brand new! At my local National Guard base? Folks, we are looking at a Hitler type of takeover being possible over the next year....I urge you all to check out your local bases to see if similar buildups exist....
I envision a massive market crash, a second false terrorist attack, and then martial law here.....they are already squeezing us all with gas prices...etc...and with false wars we can not afford....we are over ten trillion dollars in debt when we should be solvent as a nation...there is no reason for our nation to be in debt at all....the DEBT we all have is money that was illegally borrowed from banks when our own treasury could have created the same money with no debt to us other than inflation....
The United States of America has succumb to greed....just like all governments and nations do....we are the poster child for deception, and greed in government....We are not a free society...like we claim to be....income taxes, and property taxes have eliminated our status as a FREE society.......any tax that can take away what you already own just because you have no money..........is NOT freedom!!! Once you buy property, there is no reason to pay taxes to OWN it. Taxes on your labor are unConstitutional, and need to be eliminated.
Taxes should never take away from citizens what they have worked hard to get. You should not have to pay taxes to keep what you have worked hard to obtain, and you certainly should not have to pay more taxes on your property if you fix it up or add to it! We live in a very strange world now. Citizens should all be outraged by property taxes!!!
The simple fact that government can take YOUR property if you can not pay taxes on WHAT you OWN....has to be unConstitutional!!!!!!! What are we Nazi Germany? We need taxes eliminated on ownership!!!!!
In fact, we have almost NO freedoms now! We can't grow our own pot, and smoke it...like George Washington did!!! We can't drive without wearing our seatbelts! Not that I would, but I despise giving tickets to idiots who refuse to wear them!
We have become the country that oppresses it's citizens instead of supporting them....no citizen should have to pay any taxes to live in their home that they own!
Alternatives exist. Progress has always been fueled by technology and innovation. New breakthroughs make solar and wind power more viable than ever. Oil cannot be fazed out over night. But we can make investing in new forms of energy a priority. Doing so will help America attain energy independence. It will help us protect the environment.
American history is full of examples that show how quickly society can be transformed by new technologies. The industrial revolution, electricity, steam power, trains, automobiles, radio, TV, computers, and the internet. In each case new technologies rapidly altered the face of society. All of these innovations have taken place in little more than a century and a half.
So when people say that it would be impossible to transition from an oil based economy to an economy that integrates clean, renewable forms of energy I wonder what they are basing that claim on. Investment in new technology has driven economic growth in America for more than a century. We need to stop having a self-defeating attitude about the problem posed by our reliance on oil.
As you can see, the fact that oil remains so ingrained in our way of life despite the fact that alternatives have existed for some time is an exception to the rule - not the norm. By continuing to spend taxpayer's money to subsidize big oil companies - even as they rake in record profits - and neglecting to invest seriously in new forms of energy our government is doing us a great disservice.
Investing clean energy will provide diversity to our energy system. And it will create new jobs.
Bringing up the tired old issue of ANWR, as Bush has done, will only result in a long, divisive debate in Washington. It is a purely political move designed to shift responsibility away from the White House.
So our reliance on oil goes way beyond gasoline for our cars. As noted above, we need to be looking for alternative sources for all of these things. China and India, each with about 5 times the population of the US, are just beginning to use (i.e., waste) resources at the rate we do in the US.
> wind, wave and geothermal.
I hear that said a lot ... but just how would that work Tom?
There is no way you can make up energy ... except nuclear,
the breeder reactor can make its own fuel. Whatever science
of technology is out there is what we have to work with, and
it is economics and politics that keeps things the way they
are.
I don't see how a manhatten project can help that?
To bring up ANWR is to at least offer a reasonable solution. To sit there and do nothing is silly. So even if ANWR won't be drilled until long after he's gone from the White House, at least Mr. Bush is getting the ball rolling.
If the oil conundrum were easily solvable, Mr. Bush would have done that long ago and claimed victory. However, we've been battling this oil addiction for a long, long time, and will continue to do so until some future technology comes along.
My guess is that it will be battery power.
This has led to the division of the haves and have-nots, and the numerically strong, but social destruction of the country and the economy, for the average person, at the expense of capitalists from all over the world ... in a very real sense the country has been sold to the highest bidder and the American people are just natives that are in the way of progress ... or what Bush's crew and the Republicans want to call progress.
It is not about lobbyists per se, because whatever structure we have in place we need poltical evangelists for different ideas to educate and inform the political class ... the problem is corruption and greed ... the greed that sells out a country for power and money on a global scale for some people - while everyone else is left wondering what is going on.
Actually, it's not a reasonable solution to anything. It won't significantly impact the price of gas, oil, plastic, or anything else. It won't resolve our need to find alternatives to an oil based economy (the whole national security thing, if the environmental and economic arguments are insufficient to sway doubters). So while it might allow some people (i.e., politicians) to be able to sell the fallacy that they've done something to some people, it won't make a dent in our long term needs. In short, it will be as useless in the short run and as destructive in the long run as the gas tax holiday pander in the recent primary cycle.
As for "Bush getting the ball rolling," the ANWR push me/pull me has been going on since the Carter Adminstration (if you're counting, that means Carter, Reagan, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush) didn't "get the ball rolling," so suggesting that somehow a Democratic Congress in a lame duck Presidential year would pass anything close to ANWR drilling is way beyond wishful thinking.
Tom
http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/human-greed-takes-lions-share-of-solar-energy/2007/07/02/1183351126304.html
HUMANS are just one of the millions of species on Earth, but we use up almost a quarter of the sun's energy captured by plants - the most of any species.
What????? Are we standing over the plants and stealing their sun?
Guess we can't use the sun because we might use too much.
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html
There's more than just ANWAR available so we have oil if we were allowed to get it. But if you want to get oil suddenly you are an insensitive idiot who wants nothing more than to destroy the planet.
Why is it that those who see oil as something we're going to need for the foreseeable future labeled as not caring? However if you want to force people to do something that they don't want to do all in the name of the "environment" you walk on water and are all knowing and all caring and you can do no wrong.
I just don't get how one sided this argument becomes. Oil = evil.
David how many of these innovations were forced on the public through government mandates? They worked because the majority of the public wanted them. The public wasn't forced to use them. I think it's human nature to resist something when someone (especially the government) wants to force you to do something you don't want to.
Also how many "new" technology/ innovations failed? Either because the public didn't want it or it didn't work as promised.
Come to my neighborhood, Kay, an oil refinery would be a definite improvement on the scenery.
On the oil rig gig...I'll talk to Hillary about it.
No, I live in a ghetto reserve, but, it was hypothetical...wasn't it? Refinery, whatever, yes...if we need oil we should use the oil we have.
Patience pays. My current estimate is that we need regular gas at $5 per gallon in order to get the explicative deleted mini van motorists to drive 55 MPH in the 55 MPH zone instead of driving 75 MPH in the 55 MPH zone.
No, our' country needs to start drilling for the oil it has in this country wherever that may be. It's been nice talking nonsense with you. Christopher decide to add his own to the mix.
Drill away, Dubya.
I don't very often agree with Bush on anything but this is one where I do. Exploration for oil can be done in a very unobtrusive and environmentally friendly manner if the federal requires it and we need the oil now. Alternative sources need to be developed rapidly.
I've been disappointed in every president since Carter that we are in this energy mess at this time. I'd favor an effort comparable to the race for space or the Manhattan project to get us off oil quickly, but the fact remains that there is going to be oil needed for a lot of reasons for decades to come and not making the effort leaves us vulnerable to the oil barons of the Mideast to an unconscionable degree!
This should have been started by Carter though he had little time but definitely Regan should have made a major push for it and did not! Of course Bush I should have made the effort and then Clinton. But no one seemed to care that we were sticking our necks and our economy out to the robber barons. Now we pay the price.
Nuclear, solar, wind, hydrogen, tides, hydroelectric, fuel cells, ethanol and any other should be looked at and developed if possible but to drill in the ANWAR is a no brainer as far as I'm concerned.
More refineries need to be built without doubt, but that can be done and if the oil industry was a responsible industry it would be done already. But they want bigger guaranteed profits to do it! If someone mentioned nationalizing the industry they might become better citizens but that's not going to happen in America!
I don't really favor nationalizing energy but it may come to that if the oil companies will not be good stewards of this precious resource and its delivery system. I'd love to be able to tell the oil sheiks to put their oil where the sun doesn't shine!
Someone has mentioned that we have large oil reserves here in this country and that is true but the price needed to come up to make harvesting these feasible. It didn't need to become exorbitant, however!
Al-Maliki is a puppet of the occupation and is viewed as a collaborating with the enemy. When the coalition forces leave...al-Maliki, Chalabi, Iyad Allawi, etc. had better be in the departing flights or they'll end up strung up like Mussolini. Of course Al-Maliki and the other collaborationist don't want us to leave...we're their' body guards.
"But even at peak production, the EIA analysis said, the United States would still have to import two-thirds of its oil, as opposed to an expected 70 percent if the refuge's oil remained off the market."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4542853/
The "peak production" alluded to above would be attained around the year 2025, according to the EIA study, "Analysis of Oil and Gas Production in the National Arctic Wildlife Refuge". So despite the hype, oil from ANWR isn't going to have much of an impact in terms of helping America free itself from its reliance on foreign oil.
There is also no conclusive evidence available to back up the claims that ANWR contains vast reserves of oil, according to the report. "...there is considerable uncertainty regarding both the size and quality of the oil resources that exist in ANWR. Thus, the potential ultimate oil
recovery and potential yearly production are uncertain."
Obama has no intention of pulling out...Ron Paul would've done it without the excuses.
Maliki is in charge of nothing...if he was in charge Blackwater would not still be roaming the streets of Baghdad. He's about as in chatge as Uribe is Colombia...they're both puppets.
"Rep. Ron Paul is still in the GOP race and even drew 16% of the vote in the recent Pennsylvania Republican primary. Now his supporters are planning to stage a "revolt" at the Republican National Convention in September, possibly with the aim of securing Paul a prime time speaking slot.
Conservative radio talk show host Mike Gallagher told the hosts of Fox and Friends on Tuesday, "There is no question that this could be a major headache for John McCain."
more at:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Fox_Ron_Paul_supporters
_planning_revolt_0513.html
Spoiler.
Drilling in the ANWR would not be a solution to the supply of oil, only a means of keeping the nation and economy going as we make the conversion. Also, oil is a major ingredient in many things and will be needed in an alternative energy society. I believe it would be the responsible thing to do to insure our safety and our economy.
But to change to an alternative for most direct energy needs is, I believe, imperative. It needs action in the Carter days and still does. Waiting longer does not make good sense. Even the ANWR cannot produce all we are getting from the Mideast. And as long as we get Mideast oil, we are as vulnerable as we were in the seventies.
We basically sold out our security so they oil industry, and the auto industry could make huge continuous profits for doing nothing but indulging in what amounts to corruption.
Our system is so idiotically non-thinking and doctrinaire it it's sloganeering about patriotic, capitalism, globalism, there mini-religions are all the excuse we need to make the sign of the dollar over anything and let it puncture a vein into the American consumser's wallet.
Our government is so busy with this nebulous thing called globalization that we no longer give a damn about our own country or our own people, and that is supposed to be part of the New World Order ... but the Mega-rich people sure all care about and support each other. They just look at all the rest of the world as peasant labor and are just as happy the less well fed, well educated, less mobile, and less connected we are.
There are third world countries that are not democratic that have done a great job of helping their people develop. In fact if you look at the history according to some economists the countries that have rejected the Thomas Friedman's "Global Golden Straightjacket" are doing the best of all countries. These are the countries who nurture their own people and their own industries until they are strong enough to compete competently on the global stage.
For instance Japan's Toyota failed miserable for decades to make a decent car the world wanted to buy.
The American govenrment and lobbyists seemed intent on taking over the country and them making the system so complex that no one can understand it to see it or criticize it while decade after decade we sink into third world status.
Since we did not nurture and energy politicy and direct some effort into promising industries, we are stuck like idiots with our thumb's up our hip-pockets.
Industry is has our government by the gonads so tight that we have lost the benefit of both industry and government while only a few benefit from the corruption and private planning parts of the economy.
Again the reason ANWR should not be touched is that it belongs to all of us. If the government wants to harvest that resource, it should be given to all of us, not just a few connected buisnessmen who will reap a huge windfall, and then fail to invest it in jobs or infrastructure in the USA.
If you'll recall, taxing oil is exactly what Carter proposed a long time ago. He was ridiculed and criticized for his idea.
Who the hell are you? And why do you hide behind total anonymity? No profile, no credence.