We've heard that there is a huge concern about "overpopulation" thus thoughts and concerns of depopulation strategies. Now,Canada's National Newspaper calls for Worldwide One Child Policy!
Environment is just a convenient excuse for wealth redistribution AND population control? It is based on shoddy science
- C02 is harmless
- No scientific or economic case for any of it
- Copenhagen Treaty will circumvent the Constitution (which leaders already ignore)
- If Treaty is signed, the Bureaucrats can CLAIM we MUST abide
- Signed as an "Executive Agreement"?
- Treaty used the word "Government" NOT governance
- Can close down the free market
- Control ALL world-wide financial markets
- 2% Tax/Levy on EVERY financial transaction
Â
In the The real inconvenient truth...
The whole world needs to adopt China's one-child policy
Â
Â
Liu Jin/AFP/Getty Images
Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world's leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict.
The "inconvenient truth" overhanging the UN's Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world.
A planetary law, such as China's one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.
The world's other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity's soaring reproduction rate.
Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world's leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict.
-Doing nothing, by contrast, will result in an unsustainable population of nine billion by 2050.
*********
In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech today, President Obama asserted:
"[T]he world must come together to confront climate change."
President Obama will be attending the Copenhagen U.N. climate change conference on December 18 where he will be an active participant "as [in the words of 'The White House Blog' for Dec. 10] the global community, with the United States in a leading role, works towards securing the strongest possible outcome in Copenhagen.
*******
If you oppose U.S. participation in a new U.N. climate change agreement which would lead to a loss of U.S. sovereignty, costly "climate debt" payments to developing nations, economy-destroying caps on greenhouse gas emissions, and further empowerment of the U.N. as a world government, then contact your representative and senators and tell them to oppose any Copenhagen U.N. climate change agreement.
Â
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 32
It would never pass... neither would a global power tax...nor a one child policy.
Some of it is really bothersome, but some of it is powerless.
~M
THE BRICKER AMENDMENT
j/k
However, there are numerous people I've talked to who WANTED to be sterilized because they did NOT want to ever have children, and they were told they had to have a child or reach a certain age before it would be approved. I don't believe in forced sterilization, but refusing to allow those who WANT it to do so is ludicrous.
We should have thought about this years ago when we started rewarding women for doing nothing other than having babies. Of course, they end up being Democrats, so I'm sure that's why the entitlement programs were started and why they continue.
If mankind was not so busy wasting time, money and resources on all of these WARS we could have colonized the moon by now and had numerous space stations etc. to send people to - easing the strain on our home planet.
The bottom line is that when those in charge don't believe in God, they feel like "we have to do something about it." What I believe is that we will never get overpopulated to a point of complete unsustainability because God would not let that happen - fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, volcanoes, pestilence and other natural causes can wipe out thousands, if not millions, in the blink of an eye. Seems we're long overdue for such a culling.
Overpopulation is another scare tactic. Years ago weren't we told that the US could only handle 30 million people, I think?
And there is suppose to be a five year limit that people can be on welfare, isn't there? I thought Clinton signed that into law as part of Welfare Reform Act back when he was president.
My own Son was here over thanksgiving and he said he was in the grocery store in his town...as he was leaving the store he seen this lady dumping soda/pop out of cans he was on his way to his car and he said what are you doing?? she said I need money so I bought this soda/pop and now I can take the cans back and get my money that I have coming to me....Huh...does this make sense to anyone?? This is how our money is being spent that we pay for them to have welfare...a couple of years ago you could buy food stamps for .20 cents on the dollar...these people don't use the money to feed there family they use it for drugs for themselves! So on saying that maybe they should enforce a one child rule on those people!
You just can't as hard as you try ..you can not fix stupid!
-- that was before the huge migrations from overseas
-- we would have a decline in population without immigration
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
: (