Huge explosions were reported by firefighters who risked life and limb to save hapless victims during the World Trade Center Attack (WTC) on September 11, 2001 (9/11). Newly released video footage from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) shows evidence that could conceivably point to a conspiracy based on "controlled implosions".
Prison Planet, shows a series of videos released by the NIST that were a subject of alleged video-editing by the U.S. military and government for purposes of a cover-up. A lawsuit was filed by the International Center for 9/11 Studies who believe that the events that took place on 9/11, due to the "huge explosions" reported by first responders, run counter to the government's reports.
In the videos that follow, there are reports of "huge explosions" heard by firemen and witnesses to the the 9/11 attack on the WTC buildings aka twin towers.  The accounts of hearing "huge explosions" tends to debunk the official accounts of how several towering structures collapsed underneath their own footprints.  The theory, proposed by the NIST, firemen, and the International Center for 9/11 Studies contend that the buildings collapsed from controlled implosions from incendiary devices, not by planes.
As one fireman in the video put it:
“There was an explosion….the third explosion the whole lobby collapsed on us,†states the firefighter. Asked “was that a secondary explosion,†he responds, “yes it was ….definitely secondary explosion."
The most damaging evidence that supports the huge explosions heard from planted controlled implosions, can be seen in the collapse of Building Number 7. Â In the video, there will be testimony and visuals that support that the building fell from a huge explosion of sorts, not by a plane.
Was the downing of the twin towers a deliberate act from our government, as alleged by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran? Â Was the force of the planes enough to topple the hulking buildings? Â Or, was it the work of controlled implosions? Â You be the judge.
"Huge explosions":Â Conspiracy theory or complete act of terrorism?
In one of the clips, the video of which has been in the public domain for years, a loud, low-frequency boom can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls. Once the support columns that held up the penthouse are taken out, the rest of the building falls almost within its own footprint.©2010 by Brad Bechler for Gather.com, All rights reserved
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 23
The free-fall of building 7, numerous reports of molten metal at ground zero, numerous reports of explosions, massive clouds of puverized concrete, discovery of incendiary material in the dust, and various other pieces of evidence prove that the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.
If you don't first recognize the crime that has taken place, it makes no sense to ask who did it and why.
PJ Swanson : you're wrong. Il buildings were mined, it means that someone mined them, and that can't be the arab hijackers. Get this buildings completely down is a very difficult and very technical job that need also high complicity. If building were mined, it's obviousy an inside job.
Us government has no proof that the planes were hijacked by the 19 fellows. They were not on the passengers lists, and had no skills to carry out the skilly manoeuvres to crash this planes straight on the buildings, as the planes were definitely above the max allowed speed.
Colin Powel just after 9/11 claimed he had much proof of the guilt of the arab hijackers and of Ben Laden, but he never show one of them.
I've also noticed one other little detail: when I ask if anyone has evidence of anything, instead of getting a reply with evidence, I get nothing more than anecdotes, conjecture, assumptions, and some garbage about the Illuminati.
None of this is evidence.
Haven't you seen the numerous reports of molten metal at ground zero WEEKS after 9/11? The fires in the 3 towers did NOT burn hot enough to create the temperatures recorded in the rubble.
Don't you know that NIST acknowledged that WTC7 came down at FREE FALL acceleration for 2.25 seconds in their Final Report? Free fall can only be caused by an instantaneous removal of the building support columns, which is only possible through controlled demolition. Fire is not capable of that type of precision.
How do you explain the discoveries of iron microspheres and thermitic residue found in the WTC dust?
If you really looked at the data logically, then you wouldn't believe we were lied to about 9/11; you would KNOW that we were lied to.
You did'nt search much. There a lot of serious 9/11 sites. How to explain very high temperatures in the rubbles, fires in rubble lasting 100 days, ponds of molten steel, huge mass of pulverised concrete, collapse of two 400 meter's towers at near free fall speed, numerous explosions in the two towers ?
And why there was four hijacked planes this morning and not one was intercepted ?
There are so much questions and so little answers.
"And believe me when I say, some of my friends are the right people to ask. "" No need right people to ask, but right responses to listen.
Nobody who has an understanding of the laws of physics will claim that the fires were responsible for Buiding 7's destruction... unless they are lying. But don't believe me. Don't believe NIST, Popular Mechanics or any other "authority" either. Ask someone you personally know and trust, who is a professional in architecture or engineering.
http://www.ae911truth.org/
This is why I say to the defenders of the official conspiracy theory: ask a technical professional you know and trust about WTC7. It's a challenge that no one can argue against.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8182697765360042032#