Official video from the last shuttle mission has been reviewed and analyzed. Did NASA coverup evidence of a UFO?
A segment from NASA's live, public feed shows an angle of the Atlantis cargo bay and boom being opened and serviced. The ground controller on the last shuttle flight is describing the action to the audience, and it's all pretty dry stuff.
Until about the 4:30 mark.
Suddenly the camera pans upward and three orbs appear, flying in the increasingly familiar triangle formation.
As the image plays out, it seems the narrator and other commenters are trying very hard to persuade anyone watching that what they are seeing are random reflections of light off a piece of tin foil. Really?
Why go to such lengths to dismiss the image as something, anything, other than a UFO? It seems the controllers jumped right into an explanation before any rumors got started. That's suspicious enough on its own.
But the explanation given (unasked for, by the way) is pretty lame. It asks anyone watching to distrust their own eyes.
The objects dance away from each other and don't seem to be caused by a reflection from the lens. They act independently, yet always maintain equidistant juxtaposition from each other.
The objects may not be of the unidentified flying object kind, but it seems strange the NASA people would want to kill the prospects of any UFO rumors cropping up.
It didn't work.
Here's the video. Jump to about the 4:00 mark to catch the segment in context.
What do you think?
Please leave a comment below.
Image courtesy of Blogger
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 23 ( 5 removed by Tom Rose )
Not saying its aliens, but its not reflections from foil any more that the big blue planet in the shot is the sun reflected off a weather balloon and lighting up some swamp gas. I mean seriously, what total moron with an active brain cell would believe this crap?
Obviously a cover up of something that shouldn't have been on camera or seen by the public, but then what is it they so blatantly lie about and eagerly jump to making up lies about? An Iranian missile test? North Korean? Something else that shouldn't have been on camera for the masses to see?
OK, so the first object
and the other three “orbs”
have gone by right?
Is this written by NASA?
If Yes, why they call it "orbs?"
I've seen it first hand and its happened to me. It's exactly what they say it is. You'll know as soon as it happens to you. Most small telephoto lenses will not experience this ever but, try putting a wide angle adapter on and you catch the sunlight just right and it will do what you see here.
If you go to the six minute mark, you will hear;
Male ground-voice inquires; "OK, we're seeing three of four objects, uh, can you confirm that it's just the one that's actually moving, the other ones are just reflections?"
Crew member responds; "Uh, there are, there are three objects. The one you see, you see two rings right there, they're the ones we kinda had the late tally-ho on.
Uh, the one down a' the bottom, that was the one we initially saw that appeared to be foil. So we've got like two rings and then the piece of foil. The piece of foil, um, seems to be further in front, with the grounding strap on it, seems to be further in front of the other two . . and the other two seem to be about same equidistant from both us and the forward one."
Male Ground; "Copy that."
Female ground-voice; The crew is actually commanding this para-bay camera to look at the objects observed out the flight deck windows. "
Whatever else is going on in this video, it seems rather clear to me that the crew member believes he's looking at more than just lens reflections from one object. I don't see this as evidence there was a serious cover-up going on, but it does seem to me that there was a sort of routine attempt to downplay any potential impression that something of "UFO significance" so to speak, was going on.
I've noticed that kind of "Don't think along those lines" reactions and intimations before, and seen some rather strange things from NASA in general, that leads me to suspect there's more than a little concern about how people perceive these matters. Why, is not at all easy to tell . .
It could be that more advanced technological capabilities are being experimented with or utilized than is being publicly acknowledged, and this is a means of obscuring any evidence that may appear during these missions in a preemptive way, by routinely steering us into the "UFO cover-up" realm instead.
Or, perhaps a clumsy conventional "aliens" cover-up is actually going on for whatever reasons . . Or, perhaps something even more potentially unsettling to the "modern" mindset, is believed by the "powers that be" to be involved. Something we might think of as having to do more with the "spiritual" realms . . Not creatures from across the galaxy, but "heavenly" beings that co-inhabit this part of the galaxy in some hyper-dimensional sense , as the Book for instance, speaks of in various ways.
More than a few prominent scientists seem to me to be rather heavily invested of late, in the notion of "multi-verses" and "super-dimensional" space-time . . almost to the point of conviction. And, there is a strange connection to the "God question" made by some, such as Mr. Hawking in his recent book 'The Grand Design'. Strong evidence having been found that "other" intelligent beings of some kind exist in the proximity of Earth, could explain this virtual conviction that the space-time continuum is far more complex than "standard model" science once indicated.
An open-minded attitude seems to be called for, to me.
That is foil I threw out the window after eating my burrito. I often watch the weather from Plubitari...I mean "Earth" orbit during my lunch break. Now if you will excuse me, I gotta get back to Oklahoma. Those anuses aren't going to probe themselves. Mike, i'm running a bit "behind" so I won't be able to get to you until tomorrow. Sorry.