Earth Day is celebrated all over the world. It shines a light on the protection of the environment, and that is a good thing. The first was on April 22, 1970, founded by Democratic Sen. Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin and college professor Paul Ehrlich, who started the late sixties version of the global climate change movement, called the ZPG movement, which stood for "Zero Population Growth". It was organized as a "teach in" and held in collaboration with the anti-Vietnam movement at the time.
The date was chosen for a reason, it was the 100th anniversary of the birth of the communist Bolshevik leader, Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Soviet Union, according to a new book by Brian Sussman discussed on WND, "Eco-Tyranny: How the Left's Green Agenda will Dismantle America." The author explains that Lenin "implemented version one of the green agenda". He issued a Decree on Land, declaring that all land, water and minerals "were property of the state". This connection to Lenin has been denied by some as a coincidence.
Zero Population Growth vs. Global Climate Change
In the late 1960s, ZPG became a big political movement "with strong links to environmentalism and feminism." Ehrlich compared human beings to cancer, he said "A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. ... We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions." Some proponents of ZPG endorsed such measures as legalization of abortion, education, elimination of tax benefits for families and involuntary sterilization.
The overarching fear was that population growth would result in starvation and death on a gigantic scale. The Limits to Growth, a 1972 study by a team at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) predicted the collapse of the world system in 100 years. Perhaps they had "scientific consensus"?
"If I Wanted America To Fail"
This annual tribute to Earth should be a positive day. Energy alternatives should be explored, waste should be reduced, and there should be a global "group effort" to protect the environment. Teaching kids about the importance of earth, for example, is noble. There are all kinds of ideas, that are reinforced on Earth Day in small towns, such as reusing water bottles and grocery bags, biking instead of driving, being a part of a community garden, etc.
However, there is a level of hysteria surrounding Earth Day that needs to be addressed, and it is done quite well in a video released by freemarketamerica.org. As one article in Washington Times Communities cynically stated, in reference to the "sanctimonious urgings that we abandon our evil, energy- and chemical-consuming lives in order to "save the planet," that "in an era of economic deprivation, this nonsense and false piety is becoming increasingly repugnant."
Watch, and see why it is going viral.












Comments: 155
NO COMMON SENSE.
Yes, I have an agenda. I want to save the planet from being poisoned.
Damned-straight I have an agenda...to blot out the Blight of Communism.
Mr Mark-John K is totally correct.
In fact, as the law stands, by the end of 2012 you can no longer buy 100W incandescent bulbs.
Over the next several years, you will not be able to buy the conventional bulbs in any wattage.
Those are laws, not corporate marketing.
Many Corporations were driven out of business by those laws.
If you need further proof of the absurdity, try to turn on a CFL, in 40-degree weather (or lower) and see your own mistakes in front of your face.
You need a HAZMAT "Official" if you've been unfortunate enough to have broken one...
There was also a report I saw a few months back, that talked about dirty electricity. The groups name was Green Energy, or something akin to that.
The gist was that there is an emission caused by the way a CFL uses electricity that affects many people.
They sited a study, where rooms with only fluorescent lights, filled with people with Asthma, as well as Diabetics.
In both cases, the incidents of health problems rose dramatically (more than 50%) while in the room.
It was our Government that labled the bulbs as "green".
As to boycotting, unless the law is changed, what will it accomplish?
They have already caused the bankruptcy of all manufacturers of incandescent bulbs in America.
Which may well have been the goal to begin with.
Exactly the same methodology used in the ACA, that will bankrupt all the Insurance companies.
It is an interesting tactic.
I suspect there was a hint of it, in the war against alcohol.
For years, there was a battle against 3.2 beer, that was legal for 18-21 year olds. Could not get the job done.
Suddenly they all agreed, and lowered the drinking age to 18 for all products.
As there was no longer a need, or market, for 3.2 beer, production of it was halted, and equipment converted.
Then the age limit was taken back to 21, thus eliminating the law governing 3.2 beer.
Good for you Craig. And in my opinion if "they" are gonna put mercury in light bulbs, give us back our old dependable accurate mercury thermometers. Those digital ones (the ones I have tried) are ... well less than acceptable.
Craig said: I have now lost some faith in private enterprise, which I have always supported.
Craig, I would modify that by saying "private green enterprise which is endorsed and supported by the government".
The private enterprise is not the problem because as your own action proves, the market (you as you became more informed) would take care of them in about two shakes of a lamb's tail.
But as long as they are endorsed, supported, backed up, bailed out, and even forced on us by that silly lightbulb mandate, the market ie your objections to the mercury, has no chance at correcting that.
Craig said: They try to fool people to make money because of their greed. If you call a product "green", it will fly off the shelves because most people care about the environment. There are ethical problems in private corporations.
All true however the "ethical" problems and greed are not endemic to the "private corporation" (as evidenced by the government itself endorsing and supporting those 'private' corporations in their deceit) because the gov most certainly knows about the presence of that "toxic substance".
=====
Craig Olson Apr 30, 2012, 9:35am EDT
I withdraw my endorsement of the supposedly "green" bulbs. I have now lost some faith in private enterprise, which I have always supported. They try to fool people to make money because of their greed. If you call a product "green", it will fly off the shelves because most people care about the environment. There are ethical problems in private corporations.
===
Craig Olson Apr 30, 2012, 9:32am EDT
I have investigated the "Green" bulbs, made by a private firm. It turns out that they have to be recycled at a hardware store. This means that they contain a toxic substance.
http://www.peta.org/issues/Animals-Used-for-Food/vegetarianism-and-the-environment.aspx
And then, will PETA slaughter all the animals, so they do not take up more and more land and resources?
Or do you believe they will simply vanish into the sky whoosh as if by magic?
You completely ignored my question.
If we all become vegan there will result a population boom of all animals.
How do you propose to handle that enormous increase in methane production?
http://www.peta.org/issues/Animals-Used-for-Food/vegetarianism-and-the-environment.aspx
"There will not be any population boom in farm animals."
If no animals are killed for food, exactly what do you think will happen to them?
Is the plan to sterilize them all?
Or do you plan to tell them to “Just say No!”?
Have you seen what has happened to the deer population?
We now issue “nuisance permits” to kill a dozen or more at once, because they have overrun the environment: same with Coyote and many other species, as hunting has declined.
Perhaps we could place them in internment camps, and separate the genders. Have you seen the damage a ton of bull can do when ‘denied’?
But fine, lets say all grazing animals are simply sent to an island somewhere.
What will control the Multi-flora rose (that our genius government brought to us to “help”)? Even Round-up cannot keep up!
As to plant food being ‘cheap’, you have obviously not been to a market lately. Since our Government (genius again) demands we burn corn, all crop prices have gone up dramatically.
Now consider the 80% of the earth’s land, that cannot be planted (of the roughly 57MM square miles, only 12 are tillable)! What will control the vegetation there?
While being Vegan is a noble cause, it does not help the environment.
As far as sterilization goes, we have done that to human beings. This was done in mental hospitals. We do it to dogs all the time. Any changes in diet and agriculture will be very gradual. If farmers get a few extra animals, they will just sell them to the slaughter houses as they do now. People will eat them and get fat.
You obviously have no knowledge what so ever, about either Multi-flora rose, or Crown Vetch.
Our Government brought both to us, and both need constant control.
Multi-Flora Rose within a few years can become so thick and strong, even bulldozers can get caught up in it.
It can cover hundreds of acres within a a few years (if unattended too), and spreads exponentially from there.
I have experienced it more than once, totally destroying a Brush Hog, even a large one.
Fortunately, his budget was unanimously rejected 414-0, by Republicans and Democrats....
Where is it Constitutionally-fitting to steal Taxpayer Dollars for such a thing??????
Craig
What Global warming, show me the scientific evidence that we are warming. I ask you this because I know you can’t. However I can show you evidence that it’s all been one pack of lies
http://www.c3headlines.com/2012/04/real-extreme-climate-change-lack-of-global-warming-forces-major-alarmist-to-admit-he-was-wrong.html
http://www.c3headlines.com/2012/04/climate-change-effects-agriculture-research.html
http://www.c3headlines.com/2012/04/tide-gauge-station-data-analysis-eu-scientists-confirm-sea-level-rise-not-unusual-ipcc-prediction-wr.html
http://www.c3headlines.com/2012/04/greenhouse-gas-facts-global-warming.html
http://www.c3headlines.com/2012/04/medieval-global-warming-southern-hemisphere-uruguay-mounds.html
The only warmth that I can see is all the hot air coming out of the mouths of warmegedisnests.
This happens when glaciers carve when reaching open water, one such gigantic carving is happening now in Antarctica on the Pine Island Glacier around 19 miles wide . Of course warmegedisnests have once more jumped on the bandwagon and have come out and said its proof of global warming, and again they show wilful ignorance of nature because when we look closely at Pine Island Glacier we see that this happens every few years
Ted Scambos, lead scientist at the Boulder, Colo.-based National Snow and Ice Data Center, agreed that it’s likely that the crack is part of a natural cycle.
“These are cyclical, occurring every few years, very similar in size and even shape,” said Scambos via e-mail. “As a cyclical process, they are not part of the real climate-change/ice-shelf disintegration story.”
http://blogs.nasa.gov/cm/blog/icebridge/posts/post_1319635342299.html
However probably what you never saw in the news was the father in my country who took that "An Inconvenient Truth" to the highest court in the UK my Government decided to include that documentary into our school lessons? After witness were called from both sets of climate scientists, the ones who think it’s all to do with man, and the ones who don't, the Judges in the high court found at least 9 untruths in that Nobel prize winning documentary, while not winning the court case to have it banned in our schools the schools now have to show a disclaimer
In one of my articles, I show the lies that have been told on sea level rises. If you want, the truth on sea level rises then read what geologist Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner has to say on the subject. Morner can be described as the top geologist in the world and has worked for the IPCC
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474980641598
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/3310137/Al-Gores-nine-Inconvenient-Untruths.html
and all the fish are dead,
then will the white man learn
that he can't eat money.
(Native American saying )
...the Earth is an organism all of its own. You have nothing to worry about; as was previously stated, we all have an interest and a care in a decent Living environment.
She takes care of Herself; for empirical Example:
Are you aware that the "Doomsday" Media nonsense about the Gulf Oil Spill was cured by...
...The Earth?????
I'll wager that you didn't know that the killer Oil-Slick, which according to the Media, AND THOSE FOOL SCIENTISTS OF ACADEMIA, which was to spell The End of the World, was dissolved...by an Oil-Eating Organism that miraculously sprung up in those Waters, and digested the entire thing? Were you aware of that? Haven't you noticed that, after all of the talk of Doom and Gloom, there was sudden SILENCE???
They were lying, and Fear-Mongering, Olson. Not much unlike what it is that you are doing.
Were you aware?
I'll bet not...because it doesn't fit your little Narrative...nor that of the Commies.
"Animal farming contributes greatly to global warming. "
so get off your vegan diet, and do your part - have them kill the animals so you can eat them.
by refusing to eat meat, you are adding to global warming, because the animals are a needed part of the ecosytem, will, and can, not wstop breeding, and you are personally aiding and abetting in an increase to the size of the herd.
most to the right of the mashed potatoes.
"The Republicans deny global warming because they don't want to spend any money to stop it." Perhaps they deny stupidity and waste when they actually WORK for their money.
I hate the Environment.
I hate clean drinking Water.
I love a swim in a nice, Polluted Lake.
Who needs a lovely Camp outing in a sylvan and beautiful Forest; particularly when all of those amazing wild animals and gorgeous birds keep interrupting your Solitude?
Who cares about Tree's? They don't fornicate, so who needs them?
Personally, I abhor breathing clean air...I love a good lungfull of pathogens!
Pssshhhh...alarmists, all. We have a cleaner Planet now than we did at the turn of the last Century. The Environmental Agenda is a crock of putrid crap. This Video says it all...the most convenient avenue toward neutering the most prosperous Country on the Planet: The United States.
If you'd really love to see some filth, take a visit to Shanghai...or New Delhi. Interesting it is, that these and the most Polluting Countries in the World are not only NOT demonised...but would not be expected, nor have any intention, of participating in any type of "non-polluting agenda."
Hmmmn...and just who is it that has provided the most Technology with regard to finding cleaner and more efficient ways to do EVERYTHING???
Plain and simple. It's a world-wide socialist/communist shake-down.
I find it quite humourous and rather irritating that Environmentalists actually believe that they're the only ones who like clean air to breathe, and water to drink.
Pittsburgh, eh?
Marilyn, Same where I come from in the UK Stoke on Trent was one of the most polluted cities in the UK in the 30s-40s-50s-60s, when the bottle kilns that baked the pottery ware were fired you had a job to see your in front of you, and there were so many deaths through lung disease from working in the factory's that made the pottery that the Coroner just used to sign the death certificate with the words Pneumoconiosis which is a disease coursed by dust . Now it’s one of the cleanest city's in the UK
Mark-John, I to find it irritating, they should try living for a few weeks in an environment like I have just portrayed they would wonder if they were living on another planet, bunch of idiots.
and the stench ............ i was always amazed anyone could live there.
i am told it has improved 100%.
Yes, Stoke on Trent is a great example. It's much like the "global warming" rubbish...weren't they skating on the Thames in the 1880's?
I loved your "sign-off"...mind if I use it?
...bunch of idiots.
Use it as much as you like Mark-John, I did think of putting another word in front of it but Children might be logging on and I would hate me to be accused of dirtying the minds of our children.
Yes, they were skating on the Thames and I think they could be doing the same in a few years from now, we had a taste last year when the UK hit record temperature drops of 28 below freezing, this year has not been too bad but I have seen a change in our seasons in the last few years. We seem to be getting back to what they used to be. This year March and April are back what they used to be with March winds and April showers something that we have not seen for quite sometime.
Glad to see that you are mindful of the Children...I'd better have a care in that department, myself...I'm tempted at times to express my indignance.
====
Marilyn M. Apr 24, 2012, 11:00am EDT
Wow. That video shows what's been happening. It's been happening for decades and we're finally waking up.
Imaginary markets . . . selling air in the form of Carbon Credits.
All of this is . . . for the greater good. sheeshChills is right. Great video.
and all you heard from young people in the 60's and 70's, is only a terrible person would bring a young baby into this horrible world.
50 years later - same crap still being said.
2. the chinese have a ONE child policy - not two.
no kidding.
there has not been a word contrary to that on this entire post.
THAT is what has happened to Capitalism. We haven't exercised Capitalism for many decades in this Country. Capitalism isn't the Problem...People are. Leftist People.
part of eugenics was to control population - especially the population they felt is not needed, and doent contribute.
accordfing to sanger, the founder, that is the minorities and the poor.
2: Do you want to shut it all down, put millions out of work and unable to feed their families?
Several conservatives have blasted me for being against pollution. In my view all political parties should be against pollution.
1. The real issue concerning global warming is whether or not it is, in fact, a real threat to humanity.--Whether the "green movement" is based on socialism/communism is irrelevant. If it is a real threat, and if a lot of socialists/communists believe this to be true, then that is one issue on which this faction of leftist thought is right. (Of course, I'm not beating a drum for socialism/communism here.--I'm just pointing out the error of Argument Ad Hominem.)
2. Regarding Population: Overpopulation (population explosion) and underpopulation (depopulation) are likely BOTH problems for humanity. I oppose HARSH methods to control population either way. Among other things, we shouldn't down people for having an "incorrect" number of kids. For example, we shouldn't shame/harrass people W/lots of kids such as "Octomom", but neither should we shame those, such as Fmr Sec. Of State Condaleeza Rice, who have no kids.
i agree completely with both points.
i believe where the socialist part comes into play, is using socialistic economic policy, via government intrusion to control the argument, and implemantation of 'green' agendas.
eugenics also was an excuse for racism, elitism, and bigotry in general.
the fabian society was a group of somewhat influential people, long before nazi germany.
it was indeed a technique they used, for anyone that did not fit their definition of the 'perfect race'.
to them, being jewish was considered a "disease".
how can you even put those three names in the same sentence?
pauling was a brilliant scientist, but was also a known and honored communist (just one example - awarded the lenin peace prize by the ussr).
and pete seeger?
he is a self-proclaimed, admitted communist!
heck why not make it hanoi janes birthday on that logic?
jfk ................... not a commuinist but a very odd selection to be in that group!
it also depends on whether you feel communism is good or bad.
those in the ussr, and china, saw the lable as a badge of honor.
Al Gore -