Beautiful blonde cheerleading coach Megan Crafton, age 22, has been arrested for engaging in a sexual activity with 17-year-old boy. In Indiana, 16 is the age of consent, so what's the problem?
The issue of debate is that she worked part time as an assistant cheerleading coach at Shelbyville High School. The law states that it's illegal for adults to have sex with anyone younger than 18 that they supervise or oversee. Crafton's lawyer argues that his client supervised cheerleaders, and not the 17-year-old boy, who is a basketball player at the school. Does this make it okay for a school janitor to have a relationship with a student? No!
According to Huffington Post, Megan Crafton "allegedly admitted to police that she performed oral sex on the 17-year-old boy in her car in a supermarket parking lot in January." She was questioned in February, and was just recently charged. She turned herself in, and pled not guilty to the felony charge. According to Fox News, her Facebook profile says she is engaged. Is the wedding still on?
There is an interesting collection of photos of Crafton on the Huffington Post website, including one with a man's hands on her chest in a sexual manner. The rest of the photos are fun and flirty, and feature the accused posing with what appears to be friends. In another she kisses a man's cheek. She looks like a young, typical, party-girl type.
What's your opinion? Is it okay for a 22-year-old blonde bombshell to have a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old who attended the school she worked at? Should she serve prison time? Would she be treated differently if she wasn't attractive? What if it was a 22-year-old male with a 17-year old female student?
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 12
What is sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose, to couch it in old fashioned terms. We must respond negatively to females seducing underage males if we would respond negatively to males seducing underage females.
Only a few years ago the answer to that question would not have to be asked. The very asking of the question shows how low ethics and morality have fallen. I am not placing all blame on Bill Clinton, but when we have a nation that overlooks the President's adultery with a young intern in the Oval Office then we become a nation of low morales. It was said that what a person does in their private lives away from their job is their own busness. Those who claimed that a person's fundamental character outside of their job was just as important were criticized for making it an issue. Now poor character has become the norm in public life. Why should anyone be suprised?
and who cares if she is "beautiful"? what on earth does that have to do with anything? so if she were ugly, do you think she should go to prison, but since she's "beautiful," she shouldn't? good grief.