Whitney Heichel's killer wanted to have his cake and eat it too, but now he's a solitary loser awaiting his murder trial. It's being reported that Jonathan Holt's wife has finally wised up and filed for divorce from the man accused of orally raping and murdering the 21-year-old Gresham, Oregon barista. The last update involving Mrs. Holt showcased her nearly nonchalant (or was it more like "in shock" ) comments about her husband's behavior. So it's good news to see that she's picking up and moving on like she needs to be doing.

Officials have also acknowledged that they watched Jonathan Holt as he tried to dispose of evidence connecting him to the crime. They also released some of the evidence that they knew about in the early days of the woman's disappearance. Back when Whitney Heichel first vanished, all that was released to the public was that her vehicle was found abandoned with the passenger side window busted. It's now been made known that officers noticed a large amount of blood in the passenger seat as well as bloody items near a dumpster.
There are plenty of online discussions focused on this tragic case, but it seems that a lot of focus is being given to the fact that the families involved in this tragedy are Jehovah's Witnesses. Right now the conversation is buzzing about the upcoming divorce of Holt from his wife and whether or not the young lady will be shunned by the church. To be clear, whether or not the church agrees with this woman's choice isn't an issue. Her husband is an alleged rapist and murderer and it would be downright ridiculous to "force" someone to stick by someone like that. Period.
Photo: NY Daily News
Crime analyst & profiler Chelsea Hoffman can be found on Huffington Post or Chelsea Hoffman: Case to Case. You can follow her on Twitter @TheRealChelseaH or contact her via her personal blog. Fan the Facebook page for updates on missing persons cases, issues in civil rights and details on Chelsea's fiction works.










Comments: 9 ( 9 removed by Chelsea Hoffman )
I didn't produce any claims one way or the other about the church. I simply said it doesn't matter whether or not the church agrees with this young woman's choice to see a divorce.
you read into that as....some factual errors about a religion? lump that in with your opinions that only "immoral women" can be orally raped, not being able to differentiate from "you're" and "your" is the least of your obvious troubles.
So to answer your question.
No. It is not incorrect that this adult American woman can divorce her criminal husband and the church and say 'boo' about it. That is what I said in my post, and that is what I meant. Nothing more, nothing less. Youv'e read into it what you wanted to read into it. Which is exactly why you got the answer you got from me in the first place.
Perhaps brushing up on your reading comprehension and your charming personality and you might find that people (and women in particular) might consider talking to you.
Jehovah's Witnesses are no better and no worse than anybody else same percentage of fraud ,crime, child abuse and bad guy/ good guy ratio,....as any other group nothing pure or special about em.
JW’s have had over 100 years of hiding their scandals behind the Watchtower magazine. The reality is they are as riddled with scandal as any religion that seeks to put happy face on perversion.
Research and read
http://www.watchtowernews.org/familymurders.htm
I apologize and will make sure the person's comments are removed from here on out.