Missing 13-year-old Dylan Redwine still hasn't been found and his disappearance is now a week old -- surpassing the vital 48 to 72 hour window that is most important in any investigation. The search for the young man is as coordinated as ever, though, with more than 200 volunteers dedicating their time to finding him. Will this young teenager ever be found, though?

There are several possibilities in this case, with plenty of room for speculation. That includes whether or not the young parents or other relatives have been cleared of any suspicion by officials. It's been widely publicized in the past couple of days that Dylan was visiting his father on a court ordered visitation -- which only further highlights the custodial dispute between the boy's parents. Statistically speaking, more than 350,000 parental-related disappearances occur in the United States every year. That's approximately 1,000 children being abducted or going missing per day! There are also several crimes against children that are perpetrated by those who are in the family or are otherwise trusted friends of the family of the victim. So anything is possible.
The mother of Dylan Redwine says that the boy is not one of those types of kids that would just wander off into the wilderness. He's not the stereotypical "boy's boy" that likes the great outdoors. He's "generational" and "tech-savvy," and his mother feels that he would certainly not disappear on his own without getting in touch with her somehow. This sheds a negative light on the father in as such that he was the one responsible for his care. The father claims that he had last seen Dylan early in the morning on November 19th, but when he returned from running errands, he was gone.
There have been reported sightings of Dylan walking along country roads with another young man with backpacks -- but like any high profile missing case, there are false sightings and exaggerated ones. So there is no telling as to whether or not these people actually saw Dylan -- and if they did, what could he be up to?
It's wise for officials to deeply investigate everyone involved in this child's life so as to find out an idea of what could have happened. That's not because the parents should be accused -- absolutely not. It's because this is standard protocol, due to the statistical common of children going missing during custodial disputes. In the meantime, searching area sex offenders' homes and the like may uncover clues as well. Dylan could have run away, could have been abducted or could have faced something worse, so it's important that police exhaust every single investigative avenue.
Photo source: Examiner.Com
Crime analyst & profiler Chelsea Hoffman can be found on Huffington Post or Chelsea Hoffman: Case to Case. You can follow her on Twitter @TheRealChelseaH or contact her via her personal blog. Fan the Facebook page for updates on missing persons cases, issues in civil rights and details on Chelsea's fiction works.




Comments: 82 ( 1 removed by Chelsea Hoffman )
As far as the custody dispute, a lot of couples go through bitter and angry divorces, and as I have said before, children sometimes hear things that they were not meant to hear and interpret them as something entirely different than what it was meant to be. I do know that Dylan loved both his parents and his brother and his brothers from a prior marriage.
Unfortunately, in situations like this, they are going to look at my brother as having something to do with this, but they should be looking at both parents and or anyone involved or related to their divorce proceedings. As mothers and siblings have in the past had involvement in cases like this to get back at the other parent or parents if it is a sibling. Sad, but true.
In any case, that is all I have to say at the time. As now it is going on the 8th day of Dylan’s disappearance, and I am just praying to hear some news soon. Hopefully we will hear something from my brother soon hear on our end. Until then, all I have is hope that Dylan will be found.
Has your brother taken a polygraph test or done anything else?
I am only asking so as to have the facts. I can write up a piece, and mention your quote if you want to get in touch with me privately as well. (Chelsea.hoffman@chelseahoffman.com)
The rest of your spelling is almost impeccable. I don't believe you made a typo.
So many dropped pronouns making your statement sensitive.
if you can't take ownership of what you say, we can't do it for you.
Anything in the negative is sensitive.
I see you do care about what is being said about your alleged typo. It's is interesting to note that out of your whole statement you managed to 'mistype' one single word, a very important word at that, a word which speaks to tense, past as opposed to present. A word which is sensitive when is appears in association with a missing family member. When a subject says "that is all", "that's all i know" or "that is that" it indicates the topic is sensitive to the subject and they want to en the conversation. I note the dropped pronoun in relation to don't really care and also with having looked how to put anything up. If you can't take ownership on not having done these things we can't do it for you. the pronouns appear in relation to your facebook and signing up to this page to read posts about Dylan ( BTW I read the posts without having to sign up, I signed up in order to post a comment) Anything in the negative is sensitive which is why you tell us not what you think or anyone else. It seems clear you are acutely sensitive to what is being said not only about you, it includes family members as well. I have to ask what exactly do you know, suspect or believe happened to Dylan that has caused you to use the past tense ( i disagree it was a typo since it occured in only one word) the mouth (and fingers) speak or write a word a microsecond after it is thought in the brain, you had opportunity to spellcheck and didn't? Why are you so defensive in regards to your brother? He was the last person known to have seen Dylan alive, There was nothing of Dylan's in the house nor anything with his scent on (which you have to admit is strange since he apparantly slept in a bed and would have thus left his scent snd DNA on the bedding) Statemen analysis indicates sensitivity iin your statements, I cannot say why this is so at this current time, further comments from you may reveal more. In the mean time i would suggest your brother, Dylan's father take and pass a polygraph. If he refuses then we have our answer, if he fails then we have our answer, if he passes he can then be removed from the main investigation and LE can then look at other family members and friends and work the circle out till a conclusion is reached. In the meantime i would suggest you look at where your priorities lie, finding Dylan or covering and defending your brother and yourself.
Why didn't the dogs find Dylan's scent at his fathers house? Why was Dylan's last text message to his Mom, upset he had to visit with his dad? Dad had many hours to account for the day of Dylan's disappearance, and his story seems to keep changing, why is that? Has he taken a polygraph? Can Dylan's father's attorney confirm that he met with him on that day? Why is your first priority to defend the father and all relatives, instead of the outrage at what has possibly happened to Dylan? On, and On, OPEN YOUR EYES, pull your heads out of the sand, and be angry for whatever happened to Dylan! Where is your upset for Dylan? Where is your outrage for Dylan? Where is your anger for Dylan? I don't get the self-defense attitude out of all of Dylan's supposed relatives here. I am upset, angry and outraged for Dylan.
Why does anyone need to calm down???? Your cousin, if that's really who you are, has been missing for almost two weeks! You should be frantic, yet you are not.
I would like to point out that you can't really discern whether or not someone is "frantic" in mere text alone. So I don't understand why Bridget is being attacked. She has been nothing but polite and reasonable throughout this entire ordeal.
She's the aunt of the child, not the parents. She is only trying to find out the answers to the same questions all of us are asking.
Bridget doth protest too much, me thinks.
Did the father's alibi for the morning Dylan went missing get investigated.
Too many red flags point to the father. Spite is a powerful emotion.
I have not read a single thing stated by Dylan's mother. I didn't know that she gave anger fueled opinions. Now I do. But what does that have to do with Dylan? I must say, though; if I were in her position, I would also be angry.
Just find some more recent pictures of Dylan and post them, okay?
Juli Henry is right - how do you know Dylan loved his dad - the family lived so far away? I have seen the family of an abuser show up to court time and again claiming they are there to support him, and that they saw no signs of abuse. The family of an abuser will say and do anything to protect the abuser, when Dylan is the one who needs protecting.
Where is his attorney in all of this? Again - another red flag.
Still have not heard if his alibis have checked out?
Still have not heard if he has taken a polygraph?
Every time you discuss Dylan, you use the word "love" in the past tense. What's up with that?
His family STILL supports him and defends him.
The "Best Interest of the Child" statute needs to go away and be replaced by a statute that puts the child's safety above all other needs. Only one state that I know of was looking at making this change - after the Josh Powell story.
JUDGES - Please educate yourself, please base your decisions on the safety of the child, not the rights of the parent. Do not dismiss one parent's claims because of the custody dispute.
Am I right to assume the Father was the petitioner?
No one wants to hear what a great guy the father is.
Trust me - If Dylan turns up 3 states away as a runaway, or with another abductor - I will be the first one to apologize to his family - I am just tired of all of them sticking their heads in the sand.
The head, which is the seat of logic, gets no mention. Emotionally he is innocent logically he may not be. I would ask do you think, given the acrimonious split up, the forced court vsitation, the poor relationship between Dylan and his father, mark's lifestyle, the anger at Dylan's mom that mark could in fact do something to Dylan?
The act could be out of anger that Dylan prefers his mom, anger at court involvement, anger at his ex including lashing out, anger at the expense of child support, anger ar something Dylan said or did.
Has mark made any comments ever about hating his ex, resentment about Dylan even in passing. Does he have a history of anger management problems, drinking, drugs? is violence a part of who he is either actual or threatened?
You know the man better than we do, your heart may say he is innocent, your nead may say he could have done something if he was mad enough, drunk enough. It might have been lashing out as he said in his comment to media in relation to his ex. Act in haste, repent at leisure so to speak. Regardless of how you feel emotionally, and a missing child is an emotional experience none of us want to have, thinking clearly and logically who would benefit from a missing Dylan? who could cause harm to him, who isn't doing everthing they can to find him? Who isn't calling out to him to reassure him he will be found, who isn't begging him to come home?. Where missing children are involved, even innocent parents who have had an acrimonious divorce will come togeather to make pleas for their child, to call out to them. Look and listen for the expected, what you yourself would do if it were your child. Anything other than the expected is a redflag. This includes hiding away, avoiding the media, refusing polygrpahs, limited co-operation to none, hiring of attornies and so on. Guilty people tell us of their guilt, we simply have to listen for it.
Okay, guys. Listen. I've been watching this argument for the past couple of days, and I don't want anyone to lose their accounts -- and I certainly don't want to have to remove this article because of the arguing. I don't want to, but i'll have to report it according to the rules if we continue the name calling and direct attacks.
Juli, I think you're being too tough on this family. I saw the tense she used and it didn't send up any red flags for me. This is a family who isn't even in the same state as what's going on. Let's please try to be sensitive to what they are going through. It's hard to be in this situation for everyone involved.
Christie.. please consider deleting your comment and rewording it without the name calling and the foul language. While I really could just let this argument last for days and days, I can't ignore blatant attacks. Please understand that I sympathize with what you're going through right now, so I understand that you are upset, but let's please try to not violate the TOS....